Difference between revisions of "Information Technology And Innovation Foundation (ITIF)"
From BigTechWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "* ITIF is a Big Tech funded think tank that often reflects the industry’s viewpoints. Its website says it received funding in excess of 5K in the most recent fiscal year from Amazon, Apple, Google and Facebook. * ITIF opposed Lina Khan’s confirmation to be FTC chair and Jonathan Kanter’s confirmation to lead DOJ’s antitrust division. * ITIF opposed the bipartisan Senate bill cracking down on self-preferencing and issued a report saying the practice was actually g...") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* ITIF is a Big Tech funded think tank that often reflects the industry’s viewpoints. Its website says it received funding in excess of | * ITIF is a Big Tech funded think tank that often reflects the industry’s viewpoints. Its website says it received funding in excess of $5,000 in the most recent fiscal year from Amazon, Apple, Google, and Facebook.<ref>https://itif.org/our-supporters</ref> | ||
* ITIF opposed Lina Khan’s confirmation to be FTC chair and Jonathan Kanter’s confirmation to lead DOJ’s antitrust division. | * ITIF opposed Lina Khan’s confirmation to be FTC chair and Jonathan Kanter’s confirmation to lead DOJ’s antitrust division.<ref>Law 360, 6/15/21</ref> | ||
* ITIF opposed the bipartisan Senate bill cracking down on self-preferencing and issued a report saying the practice was actually good for competition and consumers. | * ITIF opposed the bipartisan Senate bill cracking down on self-preferencing and issued a report saying the practice was actually good for competition and consumers.<ref>Communications Daily, 10/15/21</ref> | ||
* ITIF opposed President Biden’s executive order on competition because it said competition in the US tech industry was already robust. | * ITIF opposed President Biden’s executive order on competition because it said competition in the US tech industry was already robust.<ref>International Business Times, 6/20/21</ref> | ||
* ITIF opposed lawmaker efforts to target the app store practices of Big Tech, said something that wasn’t broke didn’t need fixing. | * ITIF opposed lawmaker efforts to target the app store practices of Big Tech, said something that wasn’t broke didn’t need fixing. | ||
* ITIF opposed changes to section 230, said the algorithms used by Big Tech should not be blamed for the spreading of harmful content. | * ITIF opposed changes to section 230, said the algorithms used by Big Tech should not be blamed for the spreading of harmful content.<ref>ITIF Press Release, 10/18/21</ref> | ||
Latest revision as of 01:34, 18 March 2022
- ITIF is a Big Tech funded think tank that often reflects the industry’s viewpoints. Its website says it received funding in excess of $5,000 in the most recent fiscal year from Amazon, Apple, Google, and Facebook.[1]
- ITIF opposed Lina Khan’s confirmation to be FTC chair and Jonathan Kanter’s confirmation to lead DOJ’s antitrust division.[2]
- ITIF opposed the bipartisan Senate bill cracking down on self-preferencing and issued a report saying the practice was actually good for competition and consumers.[3]
- ITIF opposed President Biden’s executive order on competition because it said competition in the US tech industry was already robust.[4]
- ITIF opposed lawmaker efforts to target the app store practices of Big Tech, said something that wasn’t broke didn’t need fixing.
- ITIF opposed changes to section 230, said the algorithms used by Big Tech should not be blamed for the spreading of harmful content.[5]
